Theoretical basis of the study of reproductive behavior of families
67 76
Keywords:
the concept of gender, demographics, economic determinism, reproductive behavior.Abstract
This article considers various theoretical concepts in studying reproductive behaviour of families, individuals. The basic attention is given the economic concept, the theory of demographic transition, the concept of preference, institutional crisis of family, and also to factorial and gender concepts. The reviewed theoretical approaches are directed to the study of reproductive behaviour, the explanation for the decline in the birth rate, the identification of the determinants and factors, which influence the state of the birth rate.
References
1 Беккер Г.С. Экономический анализ и человеческое поведение // Thesis. – 1993. – Выпуск 1. – С. 24-40.
2 Медков В.М. Демография: учебное пособие. – Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс, 2002. – 448 с.
3 Bongaarts J., Watkins S.C. Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review. – Vol. 22, N 4. – 1996. – Р. 639-682.
4 Народонаселение. Энциклопедический словарь / под ред. Г.Г. Меликьяна. – М.: Большая Российская энциклопедия, 1994. – 640 с.
5 Caldwell J.C. A theory of fertility: from high plateau to destabilization. Population and Development Review, Vol. 4, 1978. – Р. 553-577. Перевод с англ. Н.В. Зверевой. С сайта http://www.demographia.ru/articles_N/index.html?idR =20&idArt=249. Просмотрено 05.09.2012
6 Caldwell J.C. The Globalization of Fertility Behavior. Population and Development Review, ol. 27, 2001. – Р. 93-115.
7 Surkyn J., Lesthaeghe R. Value Orientations and the Second Demographic Transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An Update. Special collection 3, Article 3. – 2004.
8 Van de Kaa D. J. The Idea of a Second Demographic ransition in Industrialized Countries. Paper presented at the Sixth Welfare olicy Seminar of the National Institute of Population and Social Security, Тokyo, Japan, January 2002.
9 Социология семьи / под ред. А.И. Антонова. – М.: ИНФРА-М, 2005. – 640 с.
10 Карлсон А. Общество – Семья – Личность: социальный кризис Америки. Альтернативный социологический подход / пер. с англ.; под ред. профессора А.И. Антонова. – М., 2003. – 288 с.
11 Голод С.И. Моногамная семья: кризис или эволюция? // Психология семьи. Серия Психология семейных отношений. – Самара, 2002. –
С. 245-258.
12 Van de Kaa D. J. Postmodern Fertility Preferences: From Changing Value Orientation to New Behavior. Population and Development Review. – 2001. Vol. 27. – Р. 290-331.
13 Ajzen J. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior // Kuhl J. and Beckmann J. (eds.) / Action control: From cognition to behavior. New York: Springer, 1985.
14 McDonald Peter. Gender equity in Theories of Fertility Transition. opulation and Development Review. – 2000. – Vol. 26 (3). – Р. 427-439.
15 Hakim C. A. New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns: Preference Theory. Population and Development Review. – Vol. 29, No. 3. (Sep.,2003). – Р. 349-374.
2 Медков В.М. Демография: учебное пособие. – Ростов-на-Дону: Феникс, 2002. – 448 с.
3 Bongaarts J., Watkins S.C. Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Population and Development Review. – Vol. 22, N 4. – 1996. – Р. 639-682.
4 Народонаселение. Энциклопедический словарь / под ред. Г.Г. Меликьяна. – М.: Большая Российская энциклопедия, 1994. – 640 с.
5 Caldwell J.C. A theory of fertility: from high plateau to destabilization. Population and Development Review, Vol. 4, 1978. – Р. 553-577. Перевод с англ. Н.В. Зверевой. С сайта http://www.demographia.ru/articles_N/index.html?idR =20&idArt=249. Просмотрено 05.09.2012
6 Caldwell J.C. The Globalization of Fertility Behavior. Population and Development Review, ol. 27, 2001. – Р. 93-115.
7 Surkyn J., Lesthaeghe R. Value Orientations and the Second Demographic Transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An Update. Special collection 3, Article 3. – 2004.
8 Van de Kaa D. J. The Idea of a Second Demographic ransition in Industrialized Countries. Paper presented at the Sixth Welfare olicy Seminar of the National Institute of Population and Social Security, Тokyo, Japan, January 2002.
9 Социология семьи / под ред. А.И. Антонова. – М.: ИНФРА-М, 2005. – 640 с.
10 Карлсон А. Общество – Семья – Личность: социальный кризис Америки. Альтернативный социологический подход / пер. с англ.; под ред. профессора А.И. Антонова. – М., 2003. – 288 с.
11 Голод С.И. Моногамная семья: кризис или эволюция? // Психология семьи. Серия Психология семейных отношений. – Самара, 2002. –
С. 245-258.
12 Van de Kaa D. J. Postmodern Fertility Preferences: From Changing Value Orientation to New Behavior. Population and Development Review. – 2001. Vol. 27. – Р. 290-331.
13 Ajzen J. From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior // Kuhl J. and Beckmann J. (eds.) / Action control: From cognition to behavior. New York: Springer, 1985.
14 McDonald Peter. Gender equity in Theories of Fertility Transition. opulation and Development Review. – 2000. – Vol. 26 (3). – Р. 427-439.
15 Hakim C. A. New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns: Preference Theory. Population and Development Review. – Vol. 29, No. 3. (Sep.,2003). – Р. 349-374.
Downloads
How to Cite
Yessimova, A. B. (2012). Theoretical basis of the study of reproductive behavior of families. The Journal of Psychology &Amp; Sociology, 40(1). Retrieved from https://bulletin-psysoc.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-psy/article/view/372
Issue
Section
Sociology
