Psychodiagnostic tooling for the studying of the components of responsibility.
Keywords:
testquestionnaire of components of responsibility, validity, reliability, standardization, method.Abstract
This article represents a generalized exposition analyzing the peculiarities of the psychodiagnostic research of responsibility. The paper is dedicated to creation of a new testquestionnaire for the studying of the components of responsibility. The basic premise for the creating of this technique was a prac tical necessity for determination of the level of responsibility and the develop ment of its components (which is especially important in practical elaboration, career counseling, professional selection etc.). The article also represents the theoretical and methodological construct, stages of development of the test, representativeness of the sample is grounded as well. The paper displays the data of the quantitative (correlation) analysis, demonstrates results of verifying psychometric characteristics, describes the peculiarities of its creation. Also, the main results of verification the reliability and validity are considered in the given article. The positive correlation between the majority of the components within the developed method and behavioral acts, emotional, cognitive, ex istential components was detected out. The testquestionnaire is not focused only on the diagnosing of the general level of responsibility; it also allows distinguishing the levels of formation of each of the separate components (be havioral, emotional, volitional, normative, cognitive, valuesemantic). Given testquestionnaire includes the scale of social desirability, and this fact shows the possibility to increasing reliability of the results. It is great accent made on the theoretical background of the scientific approaches to the creation of the quantitative and qualitative methods in psychological science of nowadays. The author also dwells upon the important role of the workingout the tests and other technics of the psychometric diagnostic tooling, which makes great impact on the development of modern psychological practical tradition of psychodiagnostics, forming of new ways to researching of the psychological categories of responsibility and others. This method can be used in the scien tific research and practical elaboration of a psychologist. The future trends for the studying of this topic are identified in this article as well.References
1.Галян І. М. Психодіагностика. – 2-ге вид. – К.: Академвидав, 2011. – 294 с.
2.Наследов А.Д. Математические методы психологического исследования. – СПб.: Речь, 2006. – 392 с.
3.Наследов А. Д. SPSS: Компьютерный анализ данных в психологии и социальных науках. – СПб.: Питер, 2005. – 416 с.
4.Скребец В. А. Психологическая диагностика. – К.: МАУП, 2001. – 152 с.
5.Ушакова Т. Ю. Структурні компоненти відповідальності: теоретико-методологічний аналіз // Наука і освіта. – 2015.
– № 3. – С. 106-112.
6.Ушакова Т. Ю. Теоретический анализ психодиагностического инструментария исследования ответственности // Международная практическая школа «Парадигма». Лято-2015: сборник научных статей в 8 т. – Варна, 2015. – Т. 4. – С. 370- 377.
1.Galjan І. M. Psihodіagnostika. – 2-ge vid. – K.: Akademvidav, 2011. – 294 s.
2.Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psihologicheskogo issledovanija. – SPb.: Rech’, 2006. – 392 s.
3.Nasledov A. D. SPSS: Komp’juternyj analiz dannyh v psihologii i social’nyh naukah. – SPb.: Piter, 2005. – 416 s.
4.Skrebec V. A. Psihologicheskaja diagnostika. – K.: MAUP, 2001. – 152 s.
5.Ushakova T. Ju. Strukturnі komponenti vіdpovіdal’nostі: teoretiko-metodologіchnij analіz // Nauka і osvіta. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 106-112.
6.Ushakova T. Ju. Teoreticheskij analiz psihodiagnosticheskogo instrumentarija issledovanija otvetstvennosti // Mezhdun- arodnaja prakticheskaja shkola «Paradigma». Ljato-2015: sbornik nauchnyh statej v 8 t. – Varna, 2015. – T. 4. – S. 370-377.
2.Наследов А.Д. Математические методы психологического исследования. – СПб.: Речь, 2006. – 392 с.
3.Наследов А. Д. SPSS: Компьютерный анализ данных в психологии и социальных науках. – СПб.: Питер, 2005. – 416 с.
4.Скребец В. А. Психологическая диагностика. – К.: МАУП, 2001. – 152 с.
5.Ушакова Т. Ю. Структурні компоненти відповідальності: теоретико-методологічний аналіз // Наука і освіта. – 2015.
– № 3. – С. 106-112.
6.Ушакова Т. Ю. Теоретический анализ психодиагностического инструментария исследования ответственности // Международная практическая школа «Парадигма». Лято-2015: сборник научных статей в 8 т. – Варна, 2015. – Т. 4. – С. 370- 377.
1.Galjan І. M. Psihodіagnostika. – 2-ge vid. – K.: Akademvidav, 2011. – 294 s.
2.Nasledov A.D. Matematicheskie metody psihologicheskogo issledovanija. – SPb.: Rech’, 2006. – 392 s.
3.Nasledov A. D. SPSS: Komp’juternyj analiz dannyh v psihologii i social’nyh naukah. – SPb.: Piter, 2005. – 416 s.
4.Skrebec V. A. Psihologicheskaja diagnostika. – K.: MAUP, 2001. – 152 s.
5.Ushakova T. Ju. Strukturnі komponenti vіdpovіdal’nostі: teoretiko-metodologіchnij analіz // Nauka і osvіta. – 2015. – № 3. – S. 106-112.
6.Ushakova T. Ju. Teoreticheskij analiz psihodiagnosticheskogo instrumentarija issledovanija otvetstvennosti // Mezhdun- arodnaja prakticheskaja shkola «Paradigma». Ljato-2015: sbornik nauchnyh statej v 8 t. – Varna, 2015. – T. 4. – S. 370-377.
Downloads
Published
2015-11-27
Issue
Section
Article foreign colleagues
