Role of Sh. Alzhanov in shaping the Kazakh pedagogics

Authors

  • G. Sh. Zhumagulova М. Сaпaрбaев aтындaғы Оңтүс­тік­ Қaзaқстaн гумaнит­aрлық инсти­ту­ты­, Қaзaқстaн Республикасы, Шымкент­ қ.
        82 156

Keywords:

intelligence, personality, culture.

Abstract

This article presents the results of a psychological study of psychological characteris­ tics of educational psychology, education and training, taking into account the conditions and laws of formation of young science in Kazakhstan. Kazakh educational psychology in its scientific development proholit several stages. The main subject of our research is a young educational psychology of professorSh.Alzhanov, who belongs to representatives of the third stage. At this stage, educational psychology was part of pedology in their de­ scriptions. In this case, educational psychology by the materials of assimilation patterns of learning. So educational psychology is the science studying development of educational material, effective learning patterns, considering the psychological features in the train­ ing. That is, on the one hand studies the psychological position of the specifics of the techniques of pedagogical activity and patterns of assimilation, application in practice and methods of formation. On the other hand, education psychology plays an important role in the education system, and is designed to overcome the contradiction between learning and development. In this regard, generally considered a person’s personality, and the abil­ ity of the laws of intellectual development.

The problem of education is found in many writings Sh. Alzhanov. For ex­ ample, in the report «Immediate Tasks of the institute of research and pedagogy problems of nationalKazakh culture» the writes: «Study the past – opens the way to understanding the foundations of a new modern education. Sh. Alzhanov not only improved methods of teaching, he saw an improvement in the overall integrated system upgrade training.

Author Biography

G. Sh. Zhumagulova, М. Сaпaрбaев aтындaғы Оңтүс­тік­ Қaзaқстaн гумaнит­aрлық инсти­ту­ты­, Қaзaқстaн Республикасы, Шымкент­ қ.

References

1. Мукaнов М.М. Пси­холо­ги­чес­кое­ иссле­дов­aние­ рaссудкa в исто­ри­ко­-этни­чес­ком­ aспекте­// aвтореф­. доктор­. дисс. – М., 1980. – С.29-31.
2. Жумaбaев М. Педaгогик­a // Aнтоло­гия­ педaгоги­чес­кой­ мысли­ Кaзaхстaнa / Сост. К.Б. Жaрикбaев, С.К. Кaлиев. – Aлмaты: Рaуaн, 1995. – 299 б.
3. Деркaч A.A. Взaимосвязь­ струк­тур­ных­ компо­нен­тов­ состоя­ния­ пси­хичес­кой­ готов­нос­ти­ студен­тов­ к педaгоги­чес­­ кой деятель­ности­//Психо­ло­го­-педaгоги­чес­кие­ пробле­мы­ взaимодей­ст­вия­ учите­ля­ и учaщихся­ / Под ред. A.A. Бодaлевa, В.Я. Ляудис­. – М., 1980. – С.108.
4. Ромaновa О.Л. Рaзви­тие этни­чес­кой­ идентич­нос­ти­ у детей­ подрост­ков­. Дис. кaнд. психол­. нaук. – М., 1994. – 133 с. 5 Чернов­a О.В. Роль русской­ нaционaль­ной школы­ в психи­чес­кой­ aдaптaции ин­дивид­a//Журнaл приклaдной психо­ло­­гии. – М., 2000. – Т 2. – С.10-17.

1. Mukanov M.M. Psychological research in the understanding of historical and ethnic aspects // Author. Doctor. diss. – M., 1980. – P.29-31.
2. Zhumabaev M. Pedagogy // Anthology of pedagogical thought Kazakhstan / Comp. K.B. Zharikbaev, S.K. Kaliev. – Almaty Rauan, 1995. – 299 p.
3. Derkach A.A. Correlation of the structural components of the mental readiness of students to teaching // Psychological-pedagogical problems of interaction between teachers and pupils / Ed. A.A.Bodaleva, V.Ya.Lyaudis. – M., 1980. – P.108.
4. Romanova O.L. The development of ethnic identity in children adolescents. Dis. cand. psychol. nauk. – M., 1994. – 133 p. 5 Chernova O.V. The role of the Russian national school in mental adaptation of the individual // Journal of Applied Psychology. – M., 2000. – Т. 2 – P. 10-17.

Downloads

How to Cite

Zhumagulova, G. S. (2016). Role of Sh. Alzhanov in shaping the Kazakh pedagogics. The Journal of Psychology &Amp; Sociology, 56(1). Retrieved from https://bulletin-psysoc.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-psy/article/view/601