The structure of the value orientations of Kazakh diaspora abroad
Keywords:
Foreign Kazakhs, values, factor analysis, the structure of value sphere, ethnic culture, titular ethnic group in KazakhstanAbstract
The aim of our research is to study the value orientations of the Kazakh diaspora living abroad in Europe (for example, Germany) and Asia (for example, China). The following conclusions: the structure value sphere titular ethnic group in Kazakhstan and representatives of the Kazakh diaspora abroad is multifaceted and is characterized by both similarities and differences. Kazakhs living abroad, appreciate the sense of community and well-being, which is reflected in finding their sense of balance and in unison with himself and others, in human intimacy and friendship, humor and pleasure, romance and intimacy in the care of and willingness to help others. In addition, foreign Kazakhs tend to value orientations associated with appreciating the meaning of religion, belief in fate, in spirituality. Type the value of "independence" is interconnected with foreign Kazakhs, especially with the type of the value of "stimulation" as a desire for novelty and profound experience, and the type of the value of "maturity" as finding meaning in wisdom, harmony and tolerance. Along with this, the Kazakhs living abroad, appreciate in a lifetime opportunity for change, change, certain risk. In general, foreign Kazakhs characterized as individual values and group values in a particular maturity. Titular ethnic group in Kazakhstan, is characterized primarily by individual value orientations. They focus mainly on self-realization, while commending the individuality, the desire to dominate and dedication. Type the value of "independence" is interconnected at the titular nation of Kazakhstan, first of all, the type of the value of the "achievements" as a manifestation of social competence in terms of dominant cultural standards, entailing social approval. In addition, for the titular nation of Kazakhstan important value orientations are a happy family life and material well-being, compared to these value orientations of social activity takes a back seat. In general, the titular nation of Kazakhstan is characterized by values, above all, self, individuality, domination, commitment with the leading role in the value field of family well-being and social approval in accordance with the cultural standards. For Kazakhs living abroad, is characterized, above all, values that appear in the sense of community and well-being: finding meaning in balance and unison with himself and others, in human intimacy and friendship, humor and pleasure, romance and intimacy, in caring for others and a willingness to help. Foreign Kazakhs tend to value orientations related to the high estimation in the sense of religion, belief in fate, in spirituality, finding meaning in wisdom, harmony and tolerance while appreciating the new, change, change, risk, and that perhaps pushed their ancestors moved to China and Europe from Kazakhstan.
References
2. Братусь Б.С. Типологическая модель / Б.С. Братусь // Психология и психоанализ характер. Ц Самара: iD «Бахрах. –
М., 2002.– s.155-172.3.Бурлачук Л.Ф. Психодиагностика: учебник для Вузов / Л.Ф. Бурлачук. – СПб.: Питер, 2003. – 352 с.
4. Ермолаев О.Я. Математическая статистика для Учебник / О.Ю. Ермолаев. – М., 2003.
5.Казахская модель Этнополитики. – Алматы, 2002. – С. 94–96.
6. Карандашев В.Н. Методика Шварца для изученме ценностей.Я Концепция. – СПб.: Изд-во, 2004. – 72 с.
7.Касымова Г.С., Ниязбекова К.С. Духовно-нравственные ценностей// http://www.рус наука .com
8.Kлайн П. Справочные руководства по конструктировано тестов Kлайн П.. - К.: ПанЛтд, 1994. – 283 с.
9.Коржакова e.Я.Психологи жизненных ориентации человека. – СПб.: Издательства rKhGa, 2006. – 384 с.
10.Методика диагностики ценностных ориентаций личности. Е.b. Фанталова модификация Л. С. Kолмогоровой, // Диагностика психологической культуры школьников»: практ. Пособье для школьников / Сост. Л. С. Колмогорова. –
М.: Владос-Пресс, 2002. – s.259-263.
11. Практическая психодиагностики. Методики я вспыльчивый. – М.: Бахрах-М, 2011. – 672 с.
12.schnell t. (2006) ohne sinn kein Glück? zur relativierung und Differenzierung des zusammenhangs von sinn und Neu-rotizismus. in F. lösel& D. bender (hrsg.) 45.Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (s.314). – lengerich: Pabst science Publishers
13.Шнелл Т., Веккер П. (2006). Личность и смысл в жизни. Личность и индивидуальные различия, 41 (1), 117-129.
14. schnell, t. und P. becker (2007). Fragebogen zu lebensbedeutungen und lebenssinn. hogrefe verlag Gmbh & Co KG
15. Шварц С. Н. (1992). Универсалы в содержании и структуре ценностей: в теоретических достижений и эмпирических тестов в 20 странах. Достижения в области экспериментальной социальной психологии, 25, 1-65
16. Шварц, Ш & Блиский, Б. К психологическому структура человеческих ценностей // Журнал Личности и социальной психологии, 1987, 53. – С. 550-562.
17. Шварц Ш., Мелех Г., Леманн А., Берджесс С. Харрис М., Оуэнс В. Продление кросс-культурного справедливость теории основных человеческих ценностей с другой метод измерения // Журнал межкультурной Психология. 2001 32. 519-542.
18. Фанталова Е.Б. Новые методы диагностики в клинической психологии / Е.Фанталова Е.Б. // под. ред. b. А. Mаршинина.
– М .: Академия, 2002. - s.177-217.
19. Хамитова А.Б. Проблемы человеческий и ценностей в казахской культуре // Вестник КарГУ. – Караганда, 2008.
20. Ядов Б.А. Социологическая исследование методология, Программный, МЕТОДЫ. – Самара, 1995.
1. blyumkin v.А. Mir moralnykh tsennostey. – М., 2001.
2. bratus b. s. tipologicheskaya model b. s. bratusya / b. s. bratus // Psikhologiya i psihkoanaliz kharaktera / Pod. red. D. ya.
raygorodskogo. – samara: iD «baKhraKh. – M., 2002. – s.155–172.
3. burlachuk l. F. Psikhodiagnostika. Uchebnik dlya vUzov / l. F. burlachuk. – sPb.: Piter, 2003. – 352 s.
4. ermolaev О.yu. Matematicheskaya statistika dlya psikhologov. Uchebnik/ О.yu. ermolaev. – 2-е izd. isprр. – М., 2003.
5.Kazakhskaya model etnopolitiki. – almaty, 2002. – s. 94-96
6. Karandashev v.N. Metodika shvartsa dlya izucheniya tsennostey lichnosti. Kontseptsiya i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo.–
sPb.: izd-vo rech, 2004. – 72 s.
7. Kasymova G.s., Niyazbekova К.s. Dukhovno – nravstvennye idei u protokasakhov // http://www.rusnauka.com
8. Klayn P. spravochnoe rukovodstvo po konstruirovaniyu testov (vvedenie v psikhometricheskoe proektirovanie) / P. Klayn. –
К.: Pan ltd, 1994. – 283 s.
9. Korzhakova e.yu. Psikhologiya zhiznennykh orientaziy cheloveka. – sPb.: isdatelstvo rKhGa, 2006. – 384 s.
10. Metodika diagnostiki tsennostnykh orientaziy lichnosti Е. b. Fantalovoy v modifikatsii l. s. Kolmogorovoy, D. b.Kachirskogo // Diagnostika psikhologicheskoy kultury shkolnikov»: prakt. posobie dlya shkolnykh psikhologov / sost. l. s. Kolmogorova.
– М.: vlados-Press, 2002. – s.259–263.
11. Prakticheskaya psikhodiagnostika. Metodiki i testy. – M.: bakhrakh-М, 2011. – 672 s.
12. schnell, t. (2006) ohne sinn kein Glück? zur relativierung und Differenzierung des zusammenhangs von sinn und Neurotizismus. in F. lösel & D. bender (hrsg.) 45.Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (s.314). lengerich: Pabst science Publishers
13. schnell, t. & becker , P. (2006). Personality and Meaning in life. Personality and individual Differences, 41 (1), 117-129
14. schnell, t. und P. becker (2007). Fragebogen zu lebensbedeutungen und lebenssinn. hogrefe verlag Gmbh & Co KG
15.
schwarz, s. h. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. advances in experimental social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
16. schwartz, s. h. & bilsky, W. towards a psychological structure of human values // Journal of Personality & social Psychology, 1987, 53. – Pp. 550-562.
17. schwartz s.h., Melech G., lehmann a., burgess s., harris M., owens v. extending the cross–cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement // Journal of Cross–Cultural Psychology. 2001. – 32. – s. 519– 542.
18. Fantalova Е.b. Novye metody diagnostiki v klinicheskoy psikhologii / Е. b. Fantalova // Klyinicheskaya psikhologiya v sotsialnoy rabote / Pod red. b. А. Marshanina. – М.: akademiya, 2002. – s.177–217.
19. Khamitova А.b. Problemy chelovecheskikh tsennostey v kasakhskoy kulture// vestnik Kargu, – Karaganda, 2008.
20. yadov b.А. sotsiologicheskoe issledovanie: metodologiya, programma, metody. – samara, 1995.
