Gender self-determination of students
75 38
Keywords:
«gender», «gender determination», «gender identity», «mas culinity», «femininity», «ideal images of men and women», «selfknowledge».Abstract
In the article the problem of gender selfdetermination for young students. In particular we study the concept of «gender», «selfdetermination», «gender determination». Also considers the issues of formation of gender selfdetermi nation of students based on the ideal images of men and women in the family. Presents the components of gender selfdetermination, aimed at cognition of the perfect image, developing boy and girl on the basis of their own gender position in problem situations that satisfy personal ambitions, the demands of modern society and culture in General. Describes in detail the process of formation of a gender selfdetermination, starting with preschool age. The urgency of the problem of gender selfdetermination is caused by ne cessity of development of the individual as a subject and object of public rela tions. Already in the prenatal period and especially at the birth of a child is determined by its biological and civil floors. On the basis of this is the education of the child in society. What is gender selfdetermination? Consider first the con cept of «gender» and «selfdetermination» separately, and then set the relation ship between them. Gender – social and psychological sex of the person, the totality of his psychological characteristics and peculiarities of social behavior, manifested in communication and interaction. Basic education in gender is the psychological gender of personality, i.e. achievement of a certain level of sexual consciousness and sexual identification, real mastery of the male or female role. Selfidentity is the ability to define ourselves in the world, to understand their own capabilities, realize its place and purpose in life, to the selected sphere of public and labour activity, in personal life and career, the desire to posi tively change society. Gender determination is a process of self – awareness as a representative of one sex understanding of their own capabilities as a man or women, determining their place in the male and female society, in the family, to the selected sphere of public and labour activity, in personal life and career. Gender is a complex sociocultural process of forming (constructing) of iranskih differences in male roles, behavior, mental and emotional characteristics, and the result of this process – a social construct of gender. Important elements in designing gender differences are the opposition of «male» and «female» and the subordination of the feminine masculine. The article reveals the concept of «gender determination» is the pro cess of self – awareness as a representative of one sex understanding of their own capabilities as a man or women, determining their place in the male and female society, in the family, to the selected sphere of public and labour activity, in personal life and career. At the same time in the process of their own activities depending on the social situation of the individual (boys or girls) exteriorized the qualities inherent in him as man or woman.References
1. Хрипкова А.Г. Колесов А.В. В семье сын и дочь. – М.: Просвещение, 1985. – 286 с.
2. Геодакян В.А. Теория дифференциации по лов в проблемах человека. Человек в системе наук. – М.: Наука, 1989. – С.
171-189.
3. Малкина-Пых И.Г. Гендерная терапия. – М.: Эксмо, 2006. – С. 11.
4. Чекалки на А.А. Гендерная психология. – М.: «Ось-89», 2006. – С. 112-131.
5. Клеци на И.С. Гендерная социализация. – СПб: Изд-во Алетейя, 2004. – 92 с.
6. Машарова, Т.В., Сырцова, Е.Л. Социальное самоопределение учащейся молодежи: возможности и пробле мы. – Ки-ров: Изд-во Вят ГГУ, 2006. – С. 12-23.
7. Малова Т.В. Эстеизация полоролевого воспитания детей старшего дошкольного возраста посредством изобразительно го искусства. – Киров: Изд-во Вят ГГУ, 2006. – 110 с.
1. Hripkova A.G. Kolesov A.V. V sem’e syn i doch’. – M.: Prosveshhenie, 1985. – 286 s.
2. Geodakjan V.A. Teorija differenciacii polov v problemah cheloveka. Chelovek v sisteme nauk. – M.: Nauka, 1989. – S. 171-189.
3. Malkina-Pyh I.G. Gendernaja terapija. – M.: Jeksmo, 2006. – S. 11.
4. Chekalkina A.A. Gendernaja psihologija. – M.: «Os’-89», 2006. – S. 112-131.
5. Klecina I.S. Gendernaja socializacija. – SPb: Izd-vo Aletejja, 2004. – 92 s.
6. Masharova, T.V., Syrcova, E.L. Social’noe samoopredelenie uchashhejsja molodezhi: vozmozhnosti i problemy. – Kirov: Izd-vo VjatGGU, 2006. – S. 12-23.
7. Malova T.V. Jestetizacija polorolevogo vospitanija detej starshego doshkol’nogo vozrasta posredstvom izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva. – Kirov: Izd-vo VjatGGU, 2006. – 110 s.
8. Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing // Psychological Review. – 1981. – 88. – P. 354-364.
9. Dossey, J.A., Mullis, I.V.S., Lindquist, M.M., & Chambers, D.L. The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up? Trends and achievement based on the 1986 National Assessment. Princeton, 1988, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
2. Геодакян В.А. Теория дифференциации по лов в проблемах человека. Человек в системе наук. – М.: Наука, 1989. – С.
171-189.
3. Малкина-Пых И.Г. Гендерная терапия. – М.: Эксмо, 2006. – С. 11.
4. Чекалки на А.А. Гендерная психология. – М.: «Ось-89», 2006. – С. 112-131.
5. Клеци на И.С. Гендерная социализация. – СПб: Изд-во Алетейя, 2004. – 92 с.
6. Машарова, Т.В., Сырцова, Е.Л. Социальное самоопределение учащейся молодежи: возможности и пробле мы. – Ки-ров: Изд-во Вят ГГУ, 2006. – С. 12-23.
7. Малова Т.В. Эстеизация полоролевого воспитания детей старшего дошкольного возраста посредством изобразительно го искусства. – Киров: Изд-во Вят ГГУ, 2006. – 110 с.
1. Hripkova A.G. Kolesov A.V. V sem’e syn i doch’. – M.: Prosveshhenie, 1985. – 286 s.
2. Geodakjan V.A. Teorija differenciacii polov v problemah cheloveka. Chelovek v sisteme nauk. – M.: Nauka, 1989. – S. 171-189.
3. Malkina-Pyh I.G. Gendernaja terapija. – M.: Jeksmo, 2006. – S. 11.
4. Chekalkina A.A. Gendernaja psihologija. – M.: «Os’-89», 2006. – S. 112-131.
5. Klecina I.S. Gendernaja socializacija. – SPb: Izd-vo Aletejja, 2004. – 92 s.
6. Masharova, T.V., Syrcova, E.L. Social’noe samoopredelenie uchashhejsja molodezhi: vozmozhnosti i problemy. – Kirov: Izd-vo VjatGGU, 2006. – S. 12-23.
7. Malova T.V. Jestetizacija polorolevogo vospitanija detej starshego doshkol’nogo vozrasta posredstvom izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva. – Kirov: Izd-vo VjatGGU, 2006. – 110 s.
8. Bem, S. L. Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing // Psychological Review. – 1981. – 88. – P. 354-364.
9. Dossey, J.A., Mullis, I.V.S., Lindquist, M.M., & Chambers, D.L. The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up? Trends and achievement based on the 1986 National Assessment. Princeton, 1988, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Downloads
How to Cite
Otarbaeva, A. B. (2015). Gender self-determination of students. The Journal of Psychology &Amp; Sociology, 55(4). Retrieved from https://bulletin-psysoc.kaznu.kz/index.php/1-psy/article/view/260
Issue
Section
Sociology
