Classification of emergencies: features of character, the factor of occurrenceof social implications
Keywords:
emergencies, extremality, a natural disaster, danger, threat, anthropogenic, natural, social emergencies.Abstract
The range of issues that need to study for this scientific issues, research covers
diverse extreme (emergency) phenomena and processes, one of the manifestations
of which are the emergencies of various kinds.
The main purpose of this work is to investigate the basic natural and social is-
sues in emergency situations, the main causes and influencing factors, the impact
on their livelihoods. At the same time, made an analysis on the classification of
emergency situations that arise on the basis of various natural, anthropogenic and
sociogenic factors occurring in the territory of Kazakhstan.
In general, the scientific study of natural and anthropogenic disasters covers
monitoring, development of methods for forecasting Bank of emergencies, the abil-
ity to predict, evaluate and make decisions on the means of prevention, monitoring
and protection for the development of science and technology, targeted programs.
Scientific analysis of the current state of emergency takes its basis from the research
and development of theoretical and methodological foundations.
References
2. Общая социология / под ред. проф. А.Г. Эфендиева. – М.: Инфра-М, 2000. – С. 523.
3. Лосик Т. Поведение человека в экстремальных ситуациях. // ОБЖ. 2000. – №11. – С. 55.
4. Порфирьев, Б.Н. Государственное управление в чрезвычайных ситуациях. – М.: Наука, 1991. – 135 с.
5. Зубков В.И. Социологическая теория риска. – М.: РУДН, 2003. – С. 65.
6. Карако П.С. Проблема критериев и типологии экстремальных ситуаций во взаимоотношениях общества и природы
// Вес. Беларус. дзярж. ун-та. Сер. 3, Гiсторыя. Фiласофiя.Палiталогiя. Сацыялогiя. Эканомiка. Права. – 1993. – № 2. – C. 25–
28.
7. Бабосов Е. М. Социальные последствия Чернобыльской катастрофы, пути их преодоления – Минск: БТН-информ,
2001. 220 с.
8. Украинец А.А., Поташкин А.А. Чрезвычайные ситуации и безопасность: Экстремологический и социологический
анализ. Монография. – ГГТУ им. П.О. Сухого, 2007. – 209 с.
9. UNISDR (2004b) ‘Terminology: basic terms of disaster risk reduction’. http://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_7819isdrtermino
logy11.pdf(accessed on 5 September 2015).
10. Khan H., Vasilescu L.G., Khan A. (2008) ‘Disaster management cycle: a theoretical approach’. Managementand Marketing.
6(1). pp. 43–50.
11. Губанов В.М., Михайлов Л.А., Соломин В.П. Чрезвычайные ситуации социального характера и защита от них. – М.:
Дрофа, 2007. – С. 57.
References
1. Қazaқstan Respublikasynyң «Azamattyқ қorғau turaly» zaңy, 2014 zhyl, 11 sәuіr, №188-V
2. Obshhaja sociologija/ Pod red. prof. A.G. Jefendieva. – M.: Infra-M, 2000. – S. 523.
3. Losik T. Povedenie cheloveka v jekstremal’nyh situacijah. // OBZh. 2000. – №11. – S. 55.
4. Porfir’ev, B.N. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v chrezvychajnyhsituacijah. – M.: Nauka, 1991. – 135 s.
5. Zubkov V.I. Sociologicheskaja teorija riska. – M.: RUDN, 2003. – S. 65.
6. Karako P.S. Problema kriteriev i tipologii jekstremal’nyh situacij vo vzaimootnoshenijah obshhestva i prirody // Ves. Belarus.
dzjarzh. un-ta. Ser. 3, Gistoryja. Filasofija.Palitalogija. Sacyjalogija. Jekanomika. Prava. – 1993. – № 2. – C. 25–28.
7. Babosov E. M. Social’nye posledstvija Chernobyl’skoj katastrofy, puti ih preodolenija – Minsk: BTN-inform, 2001. 220 s.
8. Ukrainec A.A., Potashkin A.A. Chrezvychajnye situacii i bezopasnost’: Jekstremologicheskij i sociologicheskij analiz.
Monografija. – GGTU im. P.O. Suhogo, 2007. – 209 s.
9. UNISDR (2004b) ‘Terminology: basic terms of disaster risk reduction’. http://www.unisdr.org/files/7817_7819isdrtermino
logy11.pdf(accessed on 5 September 2015).
10. Khan H., Vasilescu L.G., Khan A. (2008) ‘Disaster management cycle: a theoretical approach’. Managementand Marketing.
6(1). pp. 43–50.
11. Gubanov V.M., Mihajlov L.A., Solomin V.P. Chrezvychajnye situacii social’nogo haraktera i zashhita ot nih. – M.: Drofa;
2007. – S. 57.
