Cross-cultural analysis of cognitive maps almaty and london residents

Authors

  • D. G. Naurzalina Актюбинский Региональный Государственный Университет им. К. Жубанова, Казахстан, г. Актобе Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби, Казахстан, г. Алматы
  • O. Kh. Aymaganbetova Актюбинский Региональный Государственный Университет им. К. Жубанова, Казахстан, г. Актобе Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби, Казахстан, г. Алматы
  • A. A. Karabalina Актюбинский Региональный Государственный Университет им. К. Жубанова, Казахстан, г. Актобе Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби, Казахстан, г. Алматы
  • M. K. Zholdassova Актюбинский Региональный Государственный Университет им. К. Жубанова, Казахстан, г. Актобе Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби, Казахстан, г. Алматы

Keywords:

cognitive map, spatial representations, image of the city, perception of space.

Abstract

The structure of an image of the city is always hierarchical. The perception of objects of an urban environment in temporary prospect allows to read out information on the city (its historical past, dominating values, etc.) gradually, organizing it round a basic kernel. Thus, as a rule, the object of an urban environment possessing the maximum weight, the greatest importance for the individual becomes such kernel.All other information on the city, it isn’t dependent on, whether it bears spatial or its social characteristics will be organized round this backbone kernel. After significant objects which in turn are social they caused valuable reference points and at the same time objects of satisfaction of needs of ther ecipient are defined, the greatest weight in its image of the city is got by those objects of an urban environment which at the expense of these or those (most often volume and spatial) characteristics dominate over the others. In recent years in psychology and in a number of interdisciplinary sciences growth of interest to studying of spatial representations of the person is observed. This interest isn’t casual: more and more researchers comes to a conclusion about need of the analysis of informative processes for that appearance which they have in ecologically habitual conditions, in a context of natural purposeful activity. Spatial representations are that phenomenon of an interior which is connected of surrounding space often call cognitive maps. According to opinion of a number of researchers, cognitive maps are among the earliest and strong components of memory having considerable impact on perception, storing and transformation of spatial scenes. U. Naysser believes also what exactly they control our imagination. Task of this article is consideration of results of the researches of spatial representations conducted in recent years at the person. One of results of these researches is opportunity to specify limits of legitimacy of their comparison to topographic maps of the district. In the Soviet psychology, one of the main difficulties lacks of an accurate definition of the following concepts is: spatial orientation; spatial navigation. In the western cognitive psychology there are three basic concepts, describing perception of real space it: cognitive map (cognitive map); spatial navigation and orientation.

References

1. Garling, T., Selart M., & Book, A. (1997). Investigation spatial choice and navigation in large-scale environments. In Foreman, N., & Gillett, R. (Eds.), Handbook of spatial research paradigms and methodologies, Volume One: Spatial Cognition in the Child and Adult. Hove: Psychology Press.
2. Siegel, A. W. & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Volume 10. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 37-55.
3. Барабанщиков, В.А. Динамика зрительного восприятия. – М.: Наука, 1990. – 250 с.
4. Acredolo, L. P. (1983). Spatial orientation in special populations: The mentally retarded, the blind, and the elderly. In: H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press. Pp. 143-160.
5. Downs, R. M. & Stea, D. (Eds.), (1973). Image and Environment. Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
6. Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C. & Bertolo, L. (1999). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 145-174
7. Maguire, E. A., Frackiowiak, R. S. & Frith, C. D. (1997) Recalling routes around London: Activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 7103-7110.
8. Foreman N., Sandamas G., Human spatial cognition:curreht issues and technological developments.// Вестник Каз Ну. Серия психологии и социологии. – Алматы: Қазақ университеті, 2002 –С. 38-48
9. Cherney, I. D., Jagarlamudi, K., Lawrence, E., & Shimabuku, N. (2003). Experiential factors on sex differences in mental rotation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 96, 1062-1070
10. Brabec, C., & Runco, D. (2008). Mapping out spatial ability: Sex differences in way-finding navigation . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 107, 747-760.
11. Neff, N. L. (2004). Role of strategies and prior exposure in mental rotation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 1269-1282.
12. Dan A. J. The menstrual cycle and sex-related differences in cognitive variability // Witting M. A., Peterson A. C. (eds.) Sex related differences in cognitive functioning: Developmental issues. N. Y., 1979. P. 241—260.

1. Garling, T., Selart M., & Book, A. (1997). Investigation spatial choice and navigation in large-scale environments. In Foreman, N., & Gillett, R. (Eds.), Handbook of spatial research paradigms and methodologies, Volume One: Spatial Cognition in the Child and Adult. Hove: Psychology Press.
2. Siegel, A. W. & White, S. H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Volume 10. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 37-55.
3. Barabanshikov V. A. Dinamika zritel’nogo vospriyatiya. – М.: Nauka, 1990. – 250 S.
4. Acredolo, L. P. (1983). Spatial orientation in special populations: The mentally retarded, the blind, and the elderly. In: H. L. Pick & L. P. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application. New York: Plenum Press. Pp. 143-160.
5. Downs, R. M. & Stea, D. (Eds.), (1973). Image and Environment. Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior. Chicago: Aldine.
6. Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C. & Bertolo, L. (1999). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 145-174
7. Maguire, E. A., Frackiowiak, R. S. & Frith, C. D. (1997) Recalling routes around London: Activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 7103-7110.
8. Foreman N., Sandamas G., Human spatial cognition:curreht issues and technological developments.// Vestnik KazNU. Seriya psikhologii i sociologii. – Almaty: Kazak universitety, 2002 –S. 38-48
9. Cherney, I. D., Jagarlamudi, K., Lawrence, E., & Shimabuku, N. (2003). Experiential factors on sex differences in mental rotation. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 96, 1062-1070
10. Brabec, C., & Runco, D. (2008). Mapping out spatial ability: Sex differences in way-finding navigation . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 107, 747-760.
11. Neff, N. L. (2004). Role of strategies and prior exposure in mental rotation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 1269-1282.
12. Dan A. J. The menstrual cycle and sex-related differences in cognitive variability // Witting M. A., Peterson A.C. (eds.) Sex related differences in cognitive functioning: Developmental issues. N. Y., 1979. P. 241-260.

Downloads