Government responsiveness and accountability in mongolia: its challenges and opportunities

Authors

  • Kh. Oidov Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar

Keywords:

AbstrAct. The paper issued on responding the challenges and clarifica-tion of the opportunities those lessons from the Mongolian experiences in the development of the government responsiveness and accountabilities in the democratic regime from the social

Abstract

The paper issued on responding the challenges and clarifica-tion of the opportunities those lessons from the Mongolian experiences in the development of the government responsiveness and accountabilities in the democratic regime from the socialist period. Within the framework of capacity building that requires to categorizing its development, empow-erment and strengthening-all describe an increase in the ability of social organization to achieve the goals that are institutionally set up. The paper focused on how to build political capacity and the abil-ity of individuals and institutions (organizations) to implement sustainable development strategies. The focuses such above-mentioned illuminate the challenges and opportunities of the government responsiveness and ac-countability in Mongolia. The research findings repeatedly evince that a trend of the past years, in order to identifying the declines of public trust in government institutions and public organization activities, regarding to activities of the government priorities to serve the institutional accountabil-ities in the face of public demands in connection with decision or policy making participation. This paper was initiated by the comparative data analysis in the conducting survey findings and current state of government responsiveness in Mongolia.

References

1 Matachi A., 2006. Capacity building framework, UNESCO, International Institute for Capacity building in Africa.

2 Denis Rondinelli, «Institutions and Market Development: Capacity Building for Economic and Social Transition,» Interde-partmental Action Programme on Privatization, Restructuring and Economic Democracy, Working Paper 14

3 Susan S. Raines, «International Education and Conflict: Empowering Individuals, Transforming Societies, and Making Waves: An Interview with Jane Benbow from CARE,» in Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 2004. 21 (4), 483-490 p.

4 Kiewiet, D.R. and M.McCubbins. The Logic of Delegation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

5 Pitkin, H.F. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1967.

6 International IDEA. Democratic Accountability and Service Delivery: A desk Review. Stockholm. January 2013. p5.

7 Mainwaring, S. and C. Welna. Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. P. 7.

8 NSO. Mongolian Statistical Yearbook -2012. UB. 2013. p31, P. 441.

9 NDIC. Government of Mongolia. Millennium Development Goals. The Fourth National Report. UB. 2011. P 23.

10 State Policy Analysis Institute. Mongolia’s Democracy Assessment: Changes in the Democratic Governance in Mongo-lia-2011/2012. UB. 2013
11 http://www.govindicators.org

12 Percentage of respondents in the sociological survey done within the framework of the «Changes in the State of Democratic Governance-2007/2008» study, Ulaanbaatar, 2008.
13 NSO. Mongolian Statistical Yearbook-2012. Democratic Governance Module from the Household Socio-Economic Survey data -2009/2012. UB. 2013.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-19

Issue

Section

Article foreign colleagues