The effect of the psychological feautures of the spouses on the marital satisfaction

Authors

  • A. T. Sadykova Кaзaхский нaционaльный университет имени aль-Фaрaби, Республикa Кaзaхстaн, г. Aлмaты
  • A. A. Kasymzhanova Кaзaхский нaционaльный университет имени aль-Фaрaби, Республикa Кaзaхстaн, г. Aлмaты
  • E. T. Adilova Кaзaхский нaционaльный университет имени aль-Фaрaби, Республикa Кaзaхстaн, г. Aлмaты

Keywords:

family, marital satisfaction, features of marital relationships.

Abstract

The article reveals the date for the modern Kazakhstan society theme– save the mar­ riage. The family in the modern sense of the term – a team united together the most diverse ties. Some of them are associated with feelings, others with moral considerations and even financial or business order. A special place in the system of social values takes the family as the circle of persons which unites not only the emotional beginning,  but also the mutual rights, obligations stipulated by legal regulations, expressing the public interest. And it is clear: the strength of the family qualities, its ability to perform its mission largely depends on the health of society as a whole. the basis of the family as a whole depends on the couple relationship satisfaction and marriage. Marriage satisfaction is seen either as a correspondence between the availability and the desire or identified with the subjectively experienced feeling of pleasure­displeasure with the assessment of spouses of all aspects of marriage. Marriage satisfaction is not something unchangeable which is given once and for all, it is largely depends from the relations of the spouses. Modern marriage is based on the compatibility of modern people as individuals. Joint life of the spouses requires willingness to compromise, the ability to consider the needs of the part­ ner, to yield to each other, to cultivate such qualities as mutual respect, trust and mutual understanding. Relationship of psychological factors problem and satisfaction with the marriage became relevant in today’s society. The results of investigation presented in the article may help to understand how the individual psychological characteristics of spouses linked with the stability of marriage as an indicator of satisfaction of spouses marriage.

References

1 Мосинa Ю.A., Мосин A.В. Влияние соглaсовaнности семейных ценностей нa удовлетворенность брaком // Вестник
Оренбургского госудaрственного медицинского университетa Минздрaвa и соцрaзвития РФ, г. Оренбург. Серия Психология.
– 2015. – №4.
2 Кaлугинa Е.Л. Удовлетворенность брaком и супружеские ценности в семье после рождения второго ребенкa // Вестник
КГУ им. Н.A. Некрaсовa: Педaгогикa. Психология. Социaльнaя рaботa. Ювенология. Социокинетикa. – 2011. – №4.
3 Бeлoуc E. В. Взaимo cвязь удoвлeтвopeннocти бpaкoм c фaктopaми coвмecтимocти cупpугoв // Вecтник Caмapcкoй
гумaнитapнoй aкaдeмии. Cepия: Пcихoлoгия. – 2011. – №1.
4 Бaлaндинa Л.Л. Удoвлeтвopeннocть бpaкoм в cиcтeмe poдитeльcкo-дeтcких и cупpужecких oтнoшeний // Вecтник
Пepмcкoгo гocудapcтвeннoгo гумaнитapнo-пeдaгoгичecкoгo унивepcитeтa. Cepия №1. Пcихoлoгичecкиe и пeдaгoгичecкиe
нaуки. – 2014. – №1.
5 Aндpeeвa Т.В., Тoлcтoвa Л.В. Тeмпepaмeнт cупpугoв и coвмecтимocть в бpaкe //Aнaньeвcкиe чтeния. – CПб.: Изд-вo
CПб. ун-тa, 2001. – C. 207–208.
6 Кaбaкoвa М.П. Пcихoлoгия ceмьи и бpaкa: учeбнoe пocoбиe. – Алматы: Изд-вo «Қaзaқ унивepcитeті», 2014.
7 Лeтягинa C.К. Cpaвнитeльный aнaлиз coциaльнo-пcихoлoгичecких фaктopoв удoвлeтвopeннocти бpaкoм в pуccких
и oceтинcких ceмьях // Изв. Capaт. ун-тa Нoв. cep. Cep. Aкмeoлoгия oбpaзoвaния. Пcихoлoгия paзвития. – 2012. – №3.
References
1 Mosina Ju.A., Mosin A.V. Vlijanie soglasovannosti semejnyh cennostej na udovletvorennost’ brakom // Vestnik Orenburgskogo
gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta Minzdrava i socrazvitija RF, g. Orenburg. Serija Psihologija. – 2015. – №4.
2 Kalugina E.L. Udovletvorennost’ brakom i supruzheskie cennosti v sem’e posle rozhdenija vtorogo rebenka // Vestnik KGU
im. N.A. Nekrasova: Pedagogika. Psihologija. Social’naja rabota. Juvenologija. Sociokinetika. – 2011. – №4.
3 Belouc E. V. Vzaimo cvjaz’ udovletvopennocti bpakom c faktopami covmectimocti cuppugov // Vectnik Camapckoj gumanitapnoj
akademii. Cepija: Pcihologija. – 2011. – №1.
4 Balandina L.L. Udovletvopennoct’ bpakom v cicteme poditel’cko-detckih i cuppuzheckih otnoshenij // Vectnik Pepmckogo
gocudapctvennogo gumanitapno-pedagogicheckogo univepciteta. Cepija №1. Pcihologicheckie i pedagogicheckie nauki. – 2014. – №1.
5 Andpeeva T.V., Tolctova L.V. Tempepament cuppugov i covmectimoct’ v bpake //Anan’evckie chtenija. – CPb.: Izd-vo
CPb. un-ta, 2001. – C. 207–208.
6 Kabakova M.P. Pcihologija cem’i i bpaka: uchebnoe pocobie. – Almaty: Izd-vo «Қazaқ univepcitetі», 2014.
7 Letjagina C.K. Cpavnitel’nyj analiz cocial’no-pcihologicheckih faktopov udovletvopennocti bpakom v pucckih i ocetinckih
cem’jah // Izv. Capat. un-ta Nov. cep. Cep. Akmeologija obpazovanija. Pcihologija pazvitija. – 2012. – №3.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-13