Psychological impact of social advertising features

Authors

  • D. G. Naurzalina Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби
  • O. Kh. Aymagambetova Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби
  • A. A. Tolegenova Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби
  • A. A. Karabalina Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби
  • A. B. Aymagambetov Казахский национальный университет имени аль-Фараби
  • M. K. Zhubandykova Актюбинский Региональный Государственный Университет им. К. Жубанова

Keywords:

advertizing, social influence, decision-making, social advertizing.

Abstract

The advertizing psychology belongs to category which can be so-called as «fashionable» directions in science now. Every year researchers more and more attention give to studying of phenomena peculiar to  it; there are new subjects for researches, new concepts and views of an essence of advertizing communication psychology. First of all it is connected with increase of influence of advertizing in our social life: it becomes more and more integrated into culture of society and can’t but be considered as the important phenomenon reflecting, and in many respects and defining its existence. As a result, practice of advertizing activity demands an increasing number of the data of psychological science explaining these or those phenomena and allowing us to predict changes which will become result of advertizing communication. Today focus of scientific researches in the field of advertizing psychology is concentrated on wide range. It is possible to notice that the general object of research are any and character psychological changes which arise in response to advertizing influence and cause reaction from the subject which is shown in change of its representations, the relation or behavior. The problem of psychological influences (social influences) in advertizing psychology as branches of scientific knowledge is extremely actual also because it is connected with a number of the moments of ethical character. After all any influence, or influence, assumes change of consciousness of the person, can present a certain obstacle to a freedom of choice. Many authors, for example the famous American psychologist B. F. Skinner, believe that all of us almost completely depend from each other, and no absolutely free choice, even mental, exists at all.

References

1. Гермогенова Л. Ю. Эффективная реклама в России. Практика и рекомендации. – М.: Рус Партнер ЛТД, 2004. – 258 с.
2. Федотова Л. Н.Реклама в коммуникационном процессе. – М.: КАМЕРОН, 2005. – 463 с.
3. Dahl, Darren W. et al. «Does it pay to shock? reactions to shocking and Nonshocking advertising Content among University students» Journal of advertising research 43 (2003): 268-280. – P. 268.
4. Викентьев И. Л. Приемы рекламы и public relations. – СПб.: ТРИЗ-ШАНС, 2005. – 360 c.
5. osgood C. e., the nature and measurement of meaning, Psychological bulletin, 49 (1952). – Р.197-237.
6. Зазыкин В. Г. Психология в рекламе. – М.: ДатаСтром, 2002. – 550 с.
7. Кёниг Т. Психология рекламы: ее современное состояние и практическое значение. – М.: Современные проблемы. 2005. – 485 с.
8. Nixon C.l, Mansfield P.M, thoms P. effectiveness of antismoking public service announcements on children’s intent to smoke. Psychol addict behav.2008; 22(4):496–503p.
9. Измайлова, М.А. Психология рекламной деятельности. – М. : «Дашков и К», 2007. – 416 с.
10. Гладких Н. Ю., Вайнер В. Л., Горлов С. Ю. Оценка эффективности социальной рекламы. – М.: Изд-во Международ- ного института рекламы, 2008. – 44 с.



1. Germogenova l.U. effektivnaya reklama v rosii. Praktika i rekomendatcii. – М.: rus Partner ltD, 2004. – 258 s.
2. Fedotova l.N. reklama v kommunikatcionnom protcesse. – М.: КАМЕrОN, 2005. – 463 s.
3. Dahl, Darren W. et al. «Does it pay to shock? reactions to shocking and Nonshocking advertising Content among University students» Journal of advertising research 43 (2003): 268-280. – P. 268.
4. vikint’yev i.l. Priyemy reklamy i public relations. – sPb.: Тriz-shaNs, 2005. – 360 s.
5. osgood C. e., the nature and measurement of meaning, Psychological bulletin, 49 (1952). – Р. 197–237.
6. zazykyn v.G. Psihologiya v reklame. – М.: Datastrom 2002. – 550 s.
7. Kyenig Т.Psihologiya reklamy: yeyo sovremennoye sostoyaniye i prakticheskoye znacheniye. – М.: sovremenniye problemy. 2005. – 485 s.
8. Nixon C.l, Mansfield P.M, thoms P. effectiveness of antismoking public service announcements on children’s intent to smoke. Psychol addict behav.2008;22(4):496–503p.
9. izmaylova М.А. Psihologiya reklamnoy deyatelnosty. – М.: «Dashkov i К», 2007. – 416 s.
10. Gladkih N.yu., vayner v.l., Gorlova s.yu. otcenka effectivnosty sotcialnoy reklamy. – М.: izd-voо Меzhdunarodnogo institute reklamy, 2008.- 44 s.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-28