Problems of adaptation and disadaptation In the process of family education and Socialization of the individual
Keywords:
socialization, motive, motivation, success, identity.Abstract
This article presents the results of psychological research.Socialization, de spite its obvious manifestation and the need for human life, is a complex phe nomenon. This is reflected in the absence of ambiguity in regard to its definition. I.S. Kohn rightly points out that the process of socialization “can be seen in the context of the age stratification of society, and in the context of the intergenera tional transmission of culture, and in the context of identity formation. This change of emphasis and meaningful explanation of the logic, highlighting the social struc ture, the ratio of agents of socialization, the intrinsic activity of the entity. Second ly, by some authors it is seen as a process, while others consider it the result of the process. For example, some consider socialization “totality of all social and men tal processes by which the individual learns a system of knowledge, norms and values, allowing it to function as a full member of society”. From another point of view, socialization is “the process and the result of learning and subsequent active reproduction of social experience of the individual”. Moreover, according to K. Danziger and I.S. Kon, socialization can be carried out spontaneously in a greater degree, or through targeted social impacts. But the latter is closer to the education in the broadest sense. Spontaneous and natural influence of socialism somehow affects the formation of personality. For example, the development of the individual in our society young man with a vision of “Khmer Rouge” is un likely. In this case, it does not diminish the role of the activity of the person. It highlighted something that has not been overlooked by others. Socialization the process is not passive, and sometimes did not realize the assimilation of subjec tive experience. In general, the controversy over the research activity passivity was provoked sociological structuralfunctional theory of T. Parsons. It is presented as a process of socialization of social adaptation without activity and variability of individual behavior at all stages of development.References
1 Реан А.А. Психология изучения личности. – СПб.: Питер, 1999. – 480 с.
2 Змановская Е.В. Психология девиантного поведения. – СПб.: Питер, 2002. – 437 с.
3 Годфруа Ж. Что такое психология. – М.: Мир, 1992. – Т. 2. – 473 с.
4 Клейберг Ю.А. Психология девиантного поведения: учебное пособие. – М.: Академия, 2001. – 305 с.
5 Намазбаева Ж.И. Развитие личности умственно отсталых школьников. – Алма-Ата: Мектеп, 1976. – 51 с.
6 Елисеев О.П. Конструктивная типология и психодиагностика личности. Практическая психология. – Псков: ПИНЛ, 1994. – 279 с.
7 Кун Т. Структура научных революций. – М.: Наука, 1977. – 302 с.
1 Rean A.A. Psihologija izuchenija lichnosti. – SPb.: Piter, 1999. – 480 s.
2 Zmanovskaja E.V. Psihologija deviantnogo povedenija. – SPb.: Piter, 2002. – 437 s.
3 Godfrua Zh. Chto takoe psihologija. – M.: Mir, 1992. – T. 2. – 473 s.
4 Klejberg Ju.A. Psihologija deviantnogo povedenija: uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Akademija, 2001. – 305 s.
5 Namazbaeva Zh.I. Razvitie lichnosti umstvenno otstalyh shkol’nikov. – Alma-Ata: Mektep, 1976. – 51 s.
6 Eliseev O.P. Konstruktivnaja tipologija i psihodiagnostika lichnosti. Prakticheskaja psihologija. – Pskov: PINL, 1994. – 279 s.
7 Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revoljucij. – M.: Nauka, 1977. – 302 s.
2 Змановская Е.В. Психология девиантного поведения. – СПб.: Питер, 2002. – 437 с.
3 Годфруа Ж. Что такое психология. – М.: Мир, 1992. – Т. 2. – 473 с.
4 Клейберг Ю.А. Психология девиантного поведения: учебное пособие. – М.: Академия, 2001. – 305 с.
5 Намазбаева Ж.И. Развитие личности умственно отсталых школьников. – Алма-Ата: Мектеп, 1976. – 51 с.
6 Елисеев О.П. Конструктивная типология и психодиагностика личности. Практическая психология. – Псков: ПИНЛ, 1994. – 279 с.
7 Кун Т. Структура научных революций. – М.: Наука, 1977. – 302 с.
1 Rean A.A. Psihologija izuchenija lichnosti. – SPb.: Piter, 1999. – 480 s.
2 Zmanovskaja E.V. Psihologija deviantnogo povedenija. – SPb.: Piter, 2002. – 437 s.
3 Godfrua Zh. Chto takoe psihologija. – M.: Mir, 1992. – T. 2. – 473 s.
4 Klejberg Ju.A. Psihologija deviantnogo povedenija: uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Akademija, 2001. – 305 s.
5 Namazbaeva Zh.I. Razvitie lichnosti umstvenno otstalyh shkol’nikov. – Alma-Ata: Mektep, 1976. – 51 s.
6 Eliseev O.P. Konstruktivnaja tipologija i psihodiagnostika lichnosti. Prakticheskaja psihologija. – Pskov: PINL, 1994. – 279 s.
7 Kun T. Struktura nauchnyh revoljucij. – M.: Nauka, 1977. – 302 s.
Downloads
Published
2015-11-30
Issue
Section
Sociology
