Sociology оf education Of Niklas Lumann
Keywords:
education sociology, system theory, NiklasLuman, auto poiesis, system education, training.Abstract
Article is devoted to consideration of the system theory and system education of N. Luman. Luman criticizes traditional concept of education and considers education in aspect of the system theory. Luman defines system not as distinction «an element – whole», and distinction «system world around». Starting point of the system and theoretical analysis is «dif ferentiation», and as primary distinction (differential) between system and environment acts. Across Luman traditional distinction whole and parts is replaced with distinction of system and environment. The integral property of system is its operational closeness: elements of system send to other its elements.The system is able to replicate, selforganize and correlate to itself the elements in the course of their organization and in elementary op erations (selfreference). Selfreproduction of system also is it autopoezis. Luman considers society not only selfreference, but also autopoezis sys tem. It means its ability not only to describe, but also to reproduce itself. Society is autopoezis (selfreplicating) system. The structure of autopoezis system sets possibility of selfreproduction of system taking into account change of conditions of the environment. In article conclusions of the theory of systems for education, meth odological opportunities of systemicfunctional approach in education re searches are considered. In the center of the argument of Luman there is not a development of the personality, but development of ability to train ing. Offers reconstruction of education on the basis of an autopoezis and replacement of concept of education with concept of learning ability. A problem of an education system – ability to training. Conclusions for the theory and practice of education are given. Education is a social subsys tem of modern society. Education as functionally differentiated subsystem carries out specific function. Function of an education system in relation to society consists in formation of the personality, that is, creation of the adequate environment for other social systems. Functionally differentiated education system possesses distinct internal structure own internal envi ronment, a certain formula of a kontingention. Luman considers education as symbolical construct which plays a key role in an autopoezisa of social system. In process of differentiation of society the role of education be comes more considerable.References
1 Luhmann N., Schorr K.-E. Das Erziehungsystem der Gesellschaft. – Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2002. – 233 S.
2 Luhman N., Schorr K.-E. Reflexions problemeim Erziehungs system. – Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1979.
3 Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. 6. Aufl. – Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1996. – 675 S.
4 LuhmannN.DieGesellschaft der Gesellschaft. – Frankfurt a. M.- 1997.
5 Luhmann N. FunktionaleMethode und Systemtheorie. In: Luhmann N. SoziologischeAufklaerung 1. Opladen - (6. Aufl.) - Frankfurt a. M. – 1991.
6 Luhmann N., Schorr K.-E. Das Texnologiedefezit der Erziehung und der Paedagogik // Luhmann N., Schorr K.-E. Zwischen Texnologie und Selbstreferenz. FragenandiePaedagogik. – Frankfurta. M.: Suhrkamp, 1982. – S. 11–40.
1 Luhmann N., Schorr K.-E. Das Erziehungsystem der Gesellschaft. – Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2002. – 233 S.
2 Luhman N., Schorr K.-E.Reflexionsproblemeim Erziehungssystem. – Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1979.
3 Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. 6. Aufl. – Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1996. – 675 S.
4 LuhmannN. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. – Frankfurt a. M. – 1997.
5 Luhmann N. Funktionale Methode und Systemtheorie. In: Luhmann N. SoziologischeAufklaerung 1. Opladen - (6. Aufl.) – Frankfurt a. M. – 1991.
6 Luhmann N., Schorr K.-E. Das Texnologiedefezit der Erziehung und der Paedagogik // Luhmann N., Schorr K. – E. ZZwwii--
schen Texnologie und Selbstreferenz. FragenandiePaedagogik. – Frankfurta. M.: Suhrkamp, 1982. – S. 11–40.
2 Luhman N., Schorr K.-E. Reflexions problemeim Erziehungs system. – Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1979.
3 Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. 6. Aufl. – Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1996. – 675 S.
4 LuhmannN.DieGesellschaft der Gesellschaft. – Frankfurt a. M.- 1997.
5 Luhmann N. FunktionaleMethode und Systemtheorie. In: Luhmann N. SoziologischeAufklaerung 1. Opladen - (6. Aufl.) - Frankfurt a. M. – 1991.
6 Luhmann N., Schorr K.-E. Das Texnologiedefezit der Erziehung und der Paedagogik // Luhmann N., Schorr K.-E. Zwischen Texnologie und Selbstreferenz. FragenandiePaedagogik. – Frankfurta. M.: Suhrkamp, 1982. – S. 11–40.
1 Luhmann N., Schorr K.-E. Das Erziehungsystem der Gesellschaft. – Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2002. – 233 S.
2 Luhman N., Schorr K.-E.Reflexionsproblemeim Erziehungssystem. – Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta 1979.
3 Luhmann N. Soziale Systeme. Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. 6. Aufl. – Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1996. – 675 S.
4 LuhmannN. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. – Frankfurt a. M. – 1997.
5 Luhmann N. Funktionale Methode und Systemtheorie. In: Luhmann N. SoziologischeAufklaerung 1. Opladen - (6. Aufl.) – Frankfurt a. M. – 1991.
6 Luhmann N., Schorr K.-E. Das Texnologiedefezit der Erziehung und der Paedagogik // Luhmann N., Schorr K. – E. ZZwwii--
schen Texnologie und Selbstreferenz. FragenandiePaedagogik. – Frankfurta. M.: Suhrkamp, 1982. – S. 11–40.
Downloads
Published
2015-11-30
Issue
Section
Sociology
